Search for: "Garcia v. Unknown Parties" Results 1 - 20 of 38
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2016, 6:48 am
The parties stipulated that the exhibit is the cocaine that was purchased by the informant from Garcia on February 12, 2013.On cross-examination, Detective Stephens testified that the controlled buy that occurred on February 12, 2013, was part of an ongoing investigation of Garcia and that another confidential source of the Illinois State Police had made several buys involving Garcia over several months prior to the incident at issue in the case at bar. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 5:10 pm by Giles Peaker
Or, ‘It wasn’t me, it was the bailiff’.Choudhury v Garcia [2013] EWHC 3283 (QB) (June 2013) [Not on Bailii. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 5:10 pm by Giles Peaker
Or, ‘It wasn’t me, it was the bailiff’.Choudhury v Garcia [2013] EWHC 3283 (QB) (June 2013) [Not on Bailii. [read post]
21 May 2015, 5:56 am
 On the 1709 Blog, Ben Challis writes on the hitherto unknown streaming royalty arrangements between Sony and Spotify, while Andy Johnstone updates readers on the reasoning of Judge Kozinski's court in the difficult Innocence of Muslims litigation in Cindy Garcia v Google. [read post]
6 May 2016, 10:42 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Legislators have no idea where technological developments will go, so banning technology prevents unknown socially beneficial evolutions. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 5:31 pm by INFORRM
On Friday 20 June 2014 Bean J heard the PTR in the case of Garcia v Associated Newspapers. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 5:53 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Sir David Eady heard an application in the case of Eze Europe Ltd v Garcia. [read post]